Monte Carlo Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Member List   Search   Contact   Sponsors  
  News   Forum FAQ   Calendars   Recalls   TSBs   Timeslips   Register   Login  
 

Fuel Economy

  Printable Version
Monte Carlo >> Your Ride >> General Monte Carlo Talk >> Fuel Economy Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Fuel Economy - 7/6/2008 10:32:41 PM   
knightfan26917


Posts: 735
Joined: 7/25/2007
From: Elgin IL
Status: offline
Fuel economy is a buzz phrase that most car buyers/owners want to maximize. Accordingly, car manufacturers are striving to give buyers excellent MPG.


Among newer Ch#$r%*ets, while not the most fuel-efficient models available, these are still considered by many to be "fuel efficient" (compared to say, trucks, SUVs, etc.), with figures I searched for online...:

2008 V6 malibu, FWD ... EPA-estimated 17 mpg city

2008 V8 (active fuel management) impala SS, FWD ... EPA-estimated 16 mpg city

2007 V8 (active fuel management) mc SS, FWD ... EPA-estimated 18 mpg city


Comparing ... the 2008 V8 G8 GT, RWD, has an EPA-estimated 15 mpg city

Meanwhile, the 2008 Dodge Charger V8, RWD, has an EPA-estimated 17 mpg city
...and the 2008 Dodge Charger 3.5 V6, RWD, has an EPA-estimated 19 mpg city



Highway EPA-estimated MPGs are touted the most, but for this comparison, I''m using the city EPA estimates, since my RWD Monte Carlos are used more or less in the city.

I''ve NEVER claimed my Monte Carlos to be fuel efficient..and I still do NOT claim that; however, comparing my real-world MPGs to EPA estimated MPGs for newer engines...imho, a few of them certainly are NOT the gas guzzlers most people see them as.... Course, options on the cars along with the type of V8/V6 engines are factors that I have not taken into account...which might be unfair.... Even so, the comparisons are intriguing to me...and, with no car payments (versus a car payment with a newer car) and lower insurance premiums for the older cars (vs higher insurance premiums for a newer car), I''ll stick with my older cars...for now, anyway....


1972 MC, 350 V8
... 1st 2008 fill-up, June 1 ... 15.18 MPG
... 2nd 2008 fill-up, July 4, after ~142 miles, 10.215 gallons .... 13.87 MPG


1976 MC, 305 V8
... 1st 2008 fill-up, June 1 ... 13.58 MPG
... 2nd 2008 fill-up, July 4, after ~137 miles, 10.095 gallons ... 13.58 MPG


1979 MC, 350 V8
... 1st 2008 fill-up, June 1 ... 15.47 MPG
... 2nd 2008 fill-up, July 4, after ~141 miles, 7.859 gallons ... 17.94 MPG


1981 MC, 3.8 V6
... 1st 2008 fill-up, June 1 ... 18.60 MPG
... 2nd 2008 fill-up, July 4, after ~139 miles, 7.086 gallons ... 19.62 MPG


1987 MC LS, 305 V8
... June 1 ... 19.26 MPG
... June 8 ... 17.10 MPG
... June 13 ... 18.40 MPG
... June 18 ... 16.43 MPG
... June 22 ... 18.78 MPG
... June 30 ... 19.03 MPG
... July 6, after ~155 miles, 8.118 gallons ... 19.18 MPG



Cort:34swm."Mr Monte Carlo.Mr Road Trip".pig valve&pacemaker
WRMNshowcase.legos.HO.models.MCs.RTs.CHD = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort
"Who do you think you''re talkin'' to?" ... Lee Roy Parnell ... ''What Kind Of Fool Do You Think I Am?''
Post #: 1
RE: Fuel Economy - 7/6/2008 11:48:29 PM   
mickey


Posts: 4804
Joined: 4/23/2005
Status: offline
mickey's photo gallery
ummm, mine is rear wheel drive.
also looks good
and still gets 50.0 mile to the gal on the hwy and 42.5 in town.

figure i am doing pretty good on it so far lol


_____________________________





(in reply to knightfan26917)
Post #: 2
RE: Fuel Economy - 7/7/2008 5:45:52 AM   
KidSpace


Posts: 1065
Joined: 7/1/2008
From: Surf-Beach, Fl
Status: offline
KidSpace's photo gallery
Hi `Cort,
Great post/information.  I enjoyed reading. Thanks for taking the time
to share/post. : )  I keep learning so much on the MCF>



Mod `Mickey,
That''s super MPG for a powerful Harley : )
Good Luck, `Space

(in reply to mickey)
Post #: 3
RE: Fuel Economy - 7/7/2008 4:30:22 PM   
Cowboy6622


Posts: 3059
Joined: 6/6/2007
Status: online
Cowboy6622's photo gallery
EPA jsut changed their ratings... cars now have to be rated for aggressive driving.  most cars fuel mileage went down this year because of that... lol  atleast thats what some guy at a honda dealer todl me.

_____________________________



"Ye thou I drive thru the valley and the shadow of rice, I will fear no turbo, for thy 3800 V6 art wit me, thy horsepower and thy torque, thou comfort me."

(in reply to KidSpace)
Post #: 4
RE: Fuel Economy - 7/7/2008 5:10:32 PM   
knightfan26917


Posts: 735
Joined: 7/25/2007
From: Elgin IL
Status: offline
Mickey ... that''s one nice mpg ;)!


KS...you are welcome.


And, cowboy ... I had heard that, too ... which is kinda sad, since most people think that newer ALWAYS means better fuel economy....

*shrugs*



Cort:34swm."Mr Monte Carlo.Mr Road Trip".pig valve&pacemaker
WRMNshowcase.legos.HO.models.MCs.RTs.CHD = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort
"The story is between the lines" ... Dave & Sugar ... ''Golden Tears''

(in reply to Cowboy6622)
Post #: 5
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
Monte Carlo Forum >> Your Ride >> General Monte Carlo Talk
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
spacerider7844
wiz kidd4940
mickey4804
solaraslayer3795
rj3672
04 intimidat3602
cowboy66223059
taz2894
montejass2745
scc245402323

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

The Monte Carlo name is a copyrighted trademark / sales mark of the Chevrolet Motors Division of General Motors.